Xeon Gold 6542Y vs EPYC 8024P

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
12.83
Xeon Gold 6542Y
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
36.86
+187%

Xeon Gold 6542Y outperforms EPYC 8024P by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking61792
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.9035.18
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.5714.03
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$409$2,878

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6542Y has 61% better value for money than EPYC 8024P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size73 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C83 °C
Number of transistors8,875 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP6FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8024P 12.83
Xeon Gold 6542Y 36.86
+187%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8024P 20556
Xeon Gold 6542Y 59047
+187%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.83 36.86
Recency 18 September 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 48
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 250 Watt

EPYC 8024P has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6542Y, on the other hand, has a 187.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6542Y is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8024P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P
Intel Xeon Gold 6542Y
Xeon Gold 6542Y

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6542Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6542Y, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.