EPYC 9745 vs EPYC 8024P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
12.81
EPYC 9745
2024
128 cores / 256 threads, 400 Watt
94.08
+634%

EPYC 9745 outperforms EPYC 8024P by a whopping 634% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.941.49
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.6122.49
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$409$12,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8024P has 1372% better value for money than EPYC 9745.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8024P and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)128
Threads16256
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Die size73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,875 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8024P and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP6SP5
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024P and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024P and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024P and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024P and EPYC 9745.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes96128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8024P 12.81
EPYC 9745 94.08
+634%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8024P 20556
EPYC 9745 150920
+634%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.81 94.08
Recency 18 September 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 128
Threads 16 256
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 400 Watt

EPYC 8024P has 344.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has a 634.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9745 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 8024P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P
AMD EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9745 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8024P and EPYC 9745, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.