Xeon W-1370 vs EPYC 7F52

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
26.01
+80.2%
Xeon W-1370
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
14.43

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Xeon W-1370 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking192501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.7083.60
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.8817.07
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,100$362

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1370 has 1367% better value for money than EPYC 7F52.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size74 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F52 26.01
+80.2%
Xeon W-1370 14.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F52 41322
+80.2%
Xeon W-1370 22926

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7F52 1426
Xeon W-1370 2078
+45.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7F52 10736
+21.4%
Xeon W-1370 8843

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.01 14.43
Recency 14 April 2020 6 May 2021
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 80 Watt

EPYC 7F52 has a 80.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon W-1370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-1370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F52 and Xeon W-1370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52
Intel Xeon W-1370
Xeon W-1370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Xeon W-1370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F52 or Xeon W-1370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.