Xeon Gold 5416S vs EPYC 7773X

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+154%
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
22.65

EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon Gold 5416S by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.98
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency19.4714.29
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$944

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache768 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S.

PCIe version4.05
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7773X 57.60
+154%
Xeon Gold 5416S 22.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7773X 91491
+154%
Xeon Gold 5416S 35976

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.60 22.65
Recency 22 March 2022 10 January 2023
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 7773X has a 154.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Xeon Gold 5416S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5416S in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7773X and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7773X or Xeon Gold 5416S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.