EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 7713P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7713P
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
51.12
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+48.1%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7713P by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.131.36
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency21.5019.90
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,010$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713P has 424% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)96
Threads128192
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier2024
L1 cache4 MB6 MB
L2 cache32 MB96 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7713P 51.12
EPYC 9654 75.70
+48.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7713P 81201
EPYC 9654 120246
+48.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.12 75.70
Recency 12 January 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 64 96
Threads 128 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 360 Watt

EPYC 7713P has 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 48.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7713P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713P and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7713P or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.