Xeon Gold 6426Y vs EPYC 7713

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.14
+117%
Xeon Gold 6426Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 185 Watt
24.02

EPYC 7713 outperforms Xeon Gold 6426Y by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.0843.15
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency21.9312.29
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,060$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6426Y has 958% better value for money than EPYC 7713.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y.

PCIe version4.05
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7713 52.14
+117%
Xeon Gold 6426Y 24.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7713 82825
+117%
Xeon Gold 6426Y 38159

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.14 24.02
Recency 12 January 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 185 Watt

EPYC 7713 has a 117.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Xeon Gold 6426Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 21.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6426Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713 and Xeon Gold 6426Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon Gold 6426Y
Xeon Gold 6426Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6426Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7713 or Xeon Gold 6426Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.