Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 vs EPYC 7713
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7713 outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 29 | 140 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.84 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 21.93 | 43.83 |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Raphael (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,060 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 4 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 5 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 53.13 | 30.68 |
| Recency | 12 January 2021 | 13 June 2023 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 12 |
| Threads | 128 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 7713 has a 73.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 246.2% lower power consumption.
The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
