EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7713

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
54.12
+19.3%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7573X by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2847
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.00no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency21.9314.78
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Milan-X (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,060no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7713 54.12
+19.3%
EPYC 7573X 45.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7713 82825
+19.3%
EPYC 7573X 69432

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.12 45.37
Recency 12 January 2021 22 March 2022
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7713 has a 19.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7573X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713 and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7713 or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.