EPYC 9374F vs EPYC 7702

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
44.06
EPYC 9374F
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
50.25
+14%

EPYC 9374F outperforms EPYC 7702 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.077.36
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency20.8514.86
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450$4,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9374F has 81% better value for money than EPYC 7702.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.85 GHz
Multiplier2038.5
L1 cache4 MB2 MB
L2 cache32 MB32 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 44.06
EPYC 9374F 50.25
+14%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7702 69980
EPYC 9374F 79826
+14.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7702 1179
EPYC 9374F 2321
+96.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7702 11647
EPYC 9374F 21440
+84.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.06 50.25
Recency 7 August 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 320 Watt

EPYC 7702 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9374F, on the other hand, has a 14% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9374F is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7702 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and EPYC 9374F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
AMD EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9374F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or EPYC 9374F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.