EPYC 4564P vs EPYC 7643P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7643P
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
44.87
+10.7%

EPYC 7643P outperforms EPYC 4564P by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4871
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.4655.33
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency18.1821.75
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date5 September 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,722$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4564P has 311% better value for money than EPYC 7643P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads9632
Base clock speed2.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million13,140 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7643P 44.87
+10.7%
EPYC 4564P 40.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7643P 68675
+10.7%
EPYC 4564P 62061

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.87 40.55
Recency 5 September 2023 21 May 2024
Physical cores 48 16
Threads 96 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 170 Watt

EPYC 7643P has a 10.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 32.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7643P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4564P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7643P and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7643P
EPYC 7643P
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7643P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7643P or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.