Xeon Platinum 8360H vs EPYC 7642

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking91not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.57no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads9648
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)8
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory size4 TiB1.12 TB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 48 24
Threads 96 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

EPYC 7642 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Platinum 8360H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and Xeon Platinum 8360H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
Intel Xeon Platinum 8360H
Xeon Platinum 8360H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8360H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or Xeon Platinum 8360H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.