Ryzen 9 5950X vs EPYC 7642

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
38.42
+28.9%

EPYC 7642 outperforms Ryzen 9 5950X by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking90158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.2326.77
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency15.5725.88
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5950X has 412% better value for money than EPYC 7642.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads9632
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier2334
L1 cache3 MB1 MB
L2 cache24 MB8 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm2CPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7642 38.42
+28.9%
Ryzen 9 5950X 29.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7642 58795
+28.9%
Ryzen 9 5950X 45599

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7642 1274
Ryzen 9 5950X 2216
+73.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7642 10479
Ryzen 9 5950X 12137
+15.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.42 29.80
Recency 7 August 2019 8 October 2020
Physical cores 48 16
Threads 96 32
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7642 has a 28.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 9 5950X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5950X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7642 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 9 5950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2477 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or Ryzen 9 5950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.