Xeon Silver 4510 vs EPYC 7601

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
20.94
Xeon Silver 4510
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
21.51
+2.7%

Xeon Silver 4510 outperforms EPYC 7601 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking265252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.61100.00
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency11.0113.57
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200$563

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4510 has 6111% better value for money than EPYC 7601.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache3 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 20.94
Xeon Silver 4510 21.51
+2.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7601 33255
Xeon Silver 4510 34170
+2.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.94 21.51
Recency 20 June 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 7601 has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 20% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and Xeon Silver 4510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
Intel Xeon Silver 4510
Xeon Silver 4510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or Xeon Silver 4510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.