Ryzen 9 3900X vs EPYC 7601

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
20.94
+2%
Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
20.53

EPYC 7601 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking265275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.6121.73
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency11.0115.54
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900X has 1250% better value for money than EPYC 7601.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache3 MB768 KB
L2 cache16 MB6 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 20.94
+2%
Ryzen 9 3900X 20.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7601 33255
+2%
Ryzen 9 3900X 32613

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7601 792
Ryzen 9 3900X 1710
+116%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7601 7699
Ryzen 9 3900X 9939
+29.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.94 20.53
Recency 20 June 2017 7 July 2019
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7601 has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X.

Be aware that EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5169 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or Ryzen 9 3900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.