EPYC 7251 vs EPYC 7601

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
21.86
+128%
EPYC 7251
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
9.58

EPYC 7601 outperforms EPYC 7251 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking248806
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.652.84
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.287.42
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200$574

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7251 has 72% better value for money than EPYC 7601.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier2221
L1 cache3 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors19200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s153.652 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 21.86
+128%
EPYC 7251 9.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7601 34079
+128%
EPYC 7251 14935

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.86 9.58
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 7601 has a 128.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

EPYC 7251, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7601 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7251 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and EPYC 7251, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
AMD EPYC 7251
EPYC 7251

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 24 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 121 vote

Rate EPYC 7251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or EPYC 7251, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.