Xeon Gold 6414U vs EPYC 75F3

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.13
+19.8%
Xeon Gold 6414U
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
36.01

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Xeon Gold 6414U by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking52100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.3045.07
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.5813.63
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,860$2,296

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6414U has 615% better value for money than EPYC 75F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.95 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier29.5no data
L1 cache2 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 75F3 43.13
+19.8%
Xeon Gold 6414U 36.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 75F3 68505
+19.8%
Xeon Gold 6414U 57200

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.13 36.01
Recency 12 January 2021 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 250 Watt

EPYC 75F3 has a 19.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Gold 6414U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 12% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6414U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 75F3 and Xeon Gold 6414U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3
Intel Xeon Gold 6414U
Xeon Gold 6414U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6414U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 75F3 or Xeon Gold 6414U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.