EPYC 9124 vs EPYC 75F3

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.13
+55.2%
EPYC 9124
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
27.79

EPYC 75F3 outperforms EPYC 9124 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking52172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.3022.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency14.5813.15
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,860$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9124 has 258% better value for money than EPYC 75F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2.95 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier29.530
L1 cache2 MB1 MB
L2 cache16 MB16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 72 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 75F3 43.13
+55.2%
EPYC 9124 27.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 75F3 68505
+55.2%
EPYC 9124 44137

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 75F3 1826
EPYC 9124 1851
+1.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 75F3 16432
+25.7%
EPYC 9124 13075

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.13 27.79
Recency 12 January 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 75F3 has a 55.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 9124, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9124 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 9124, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3
AMD EPYC 9124
EPYC 9124

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 75F3 or EPYC 9124, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.