Processor N200 vs EPYC 7552

Place in the ranking	75	2122
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.38	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	AMD EPYC	Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency	18.26	24.61
Architecture codename	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date	7 August 2019 (5 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,025	$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7552 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	48 (Octatetraconta-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	96	4
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz
Multiplier	22	no data
L1 cache	96 KB (per core)	96 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	2 MB (shared)
L3 cache	192 MB (shared)	6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	7 nm, 14 nm	10 nm
Die size	192 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	3,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7552 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	SP3	Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Precision Boost 2	+	no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7552 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	no data
Max memory channels	8	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.763 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N200.

PCIe version	4.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	128	9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	38.58	1.56
Recency	7 August 2019	3 January 2023
Physical cores	48	4
Threads	96	4
Chip lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	6 Watt

EPYC 7552 has a 2373.1% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 3233.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7552 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7552 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7552 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.