Xeon Platinum 8153 vs EPYC 7551P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551P
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
24.03
+18.6%
Xeon Platinum 8153
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
20.26

EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8153 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking212278
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.176.33
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency12.6315.34
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100$3,115

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8153 has 52% better value for money than EPYC 7551P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier2020
L1 cache3 MB1 MB
L2 cache16 MB16 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data87 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size2 TiB768 GB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551P 24.03
+18.6%
Xeon Platinum 8153 20.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7551P 38166
+18.6%
Xeon Platinum 8153 32180

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.03 20.26
Recency 20 June 2017 25 April 2017
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 7551P has a 18.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon Platinum 8153, on the other hand, has 44% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7551P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8153 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8153, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P
Intel Xeon Platinum 8153
Xeon Platinum 8153

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 80 votes

Rate EPYC 7551P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8153 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551P or Xeon Platinum 8153, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.