Xeon w9-3575X vs EPYC 7543

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7543
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
38.34
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+35.7%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms EPYC 7543 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.0433.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency16.1314.48
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,761$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3575X has 322% better value for money than EPYC 7543.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)44
Threads6488
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache2 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)97.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7543 38.34
Xeon w9-3575X 52.02
+35.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7543 60901
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+35.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.34 52.02
Recency 12 January 2021 24 August 2024
Physical cores 32 44
Threads 64 88
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 340 Watt

EPYC 7543 has 51.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 35.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 37.5% more physical cores and 37.5% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7543 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7543 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7543 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.