EPYC 9335 vs EPYC 7543

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking76not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.05no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency16.13no data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,761$3,178

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 March 2021 10 October 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 210 Watt

EPYC 9335 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543
AMD EPYC 9335
EPYC 9335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7543 or EPYC 9335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.