EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 7532

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
34.47
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
70.53
+105%

EPYC 9634 outperforms EPYC 7532 by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.07
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.7222.18
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)84
Threads64168
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.25 GHz
Multiplier2422.5
L1 cache2 MB5376 KB
L2 cache16 MB84 MB
L3 cache256 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket SP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7532 34.47
EPYC 9634 70.53
+105%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7532 52755
EPYC 9634 107944
+105%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.47 70.53
Recency 19 February 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 84
Threads 64 168
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 290 Watt

EPYC 7532 has 45% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has a 104.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 162.5% more physical cores and 162.5% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7532 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7532 and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7532 or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.