Xeon w7-2495X vs EPYC 7513

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
+1.8%
Xeon w7-2495X
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 225 Watt
36.66

EPYC 7513 outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.2348.61
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.6615.42
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,840$2,189

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w7-2495X has 333% better value for money than EPYC 7513.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6448
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.65 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache2 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7513 37.32
+1.8%
Xeon w7-2495X 36.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7513 59285
+1.8%
Xeon w7-2495X 58228

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.32 36.66
Recency 12 January 2021 15 February 2023
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 48
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7513 has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-2495X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7513 and Xeon w7-2495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513
Intel Xeon w7-2495X
Xeon w7-2495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon w7-2495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7513 or Xeon w7-2495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.