Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs EPYC 7502

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
30.21
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
39.41
+30.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms EPYC 7502 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.39no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency15.8813.32
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,600no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier2535
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7502 30.21
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 39.41
+30.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7502 47983
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62593
+30.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.21 39.41
Recency 7 August 2019 14 July 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7502 has 55.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, on the other hand, has a 30.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7502 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7502 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 88 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7502 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.