Ryzen 9 9900X vs EPYC 7502

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
30.21
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
34.52
+14.3%

Ryzen 9 9900X outperforms EPYC 7502 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking140109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.7066.82
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.8727.21
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,600$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 9900X has 768% better value for money than EPYC 7502.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.5 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz5.6 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7502 30.21
Ryzen 9 9900X 34.52
+14.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7502 47983
Ryzen 9 9900X 54828
+14.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.21 34.52
Recency 7 August 2019 15 August 2024
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 7502 has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 9 9900X, on the other hand, has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 9900X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7502 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7502 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 9900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 9900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 190 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7502 or Ryzen 9 9900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.