Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs EPYC 7453
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 128 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 16.51 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 13.39 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,570 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 28 (Octacosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.75 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.45 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 27.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 3 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 4 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 28 | 12 |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
EPYC 7453 has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 309.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7453 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7453 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
