Celeron N5100 vs EPYC 7452

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7452
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 155 Watt
28.33
+1256%
Celeron N5100
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.09

EPYC 7452 outperforms Celeron N5100 by a whopping 1256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1631876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.57no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.3032.97
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,025no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads644
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier23.5no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiB16 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7452 28.33
+1256%
Celeron N5100 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7452 44996
+1255%
Celeron N5100 3320

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7452 1075
+148%
Celeron N5100 434

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7452 8215
+662%
Celeron N5100 1078

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.33 2.09
Recency 7 August 2019 11 January 2021
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7452 has a 1255.5% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N5100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2483.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7452 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5100 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7452 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7452 and Celeron N5100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7452
EPYC 7452
Intel Celeron N5100
Celeron N5100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 71 vote

Rate EPYC 7452 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 383 votes

Rate Celeron N5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7452 or Celeron N5100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.