Xeon w3-2435 vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.28
Xeon w3-2435
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 165 Watt
16.62
+2.1%

Xeon w3-2435 outperforms EPYC 7451 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking404387
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7359.77
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.569.53
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400$669

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w3-2435 has 3355% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)22.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4400
Maximum memory size2 TiB2 TB
Max memory channels84
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.28
Xeon w3-2435 16.62
+2.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7451 25863
Xeon w3-2435 26395
+2.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.28 16.62
Recency 29 June 2017 15 February 2023
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 165 Watt

EPYC 7451 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Xeon w3-2435, on the other hand, has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Xeon w3-2435, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
Intel Xeon w3-2435
Xeon w3-2435

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon w3-2435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Xeon w3-2435, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.