Xeon E5-2678 v3 vs EPYC 7451

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.28
+75.4%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
9.28

EPYC 7451 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking404819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCXeon
Power efficiency8.567.32
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)3072 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size192 mm2356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million5,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4LGA2011-3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.28
+75.4%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 9.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7451 25863
+75.5%
Xeon E5-2678 v3 14735

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.28 9.28
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 7451 has a 75.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2678 v3, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2678 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Xeon E5-2678 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2393 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Xeon E5-2678 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.