EPYC 8224P vs EPYC 7443P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7443P
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.86
+26.1%
EPYC 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
28.43

EPYC 7443P outperforms EPYC 8224P by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking103162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.2129.48
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency16.9716.82
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,337$855

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8224P has 22% better value for money than EPYC 7443P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.85 GHz2.55 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier28.5no data
L1 cache1536 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size4x 81 mm22x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors16,600 million17,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3SP6
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12896

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7443P 35.86
+26.1%
EPYC 8224P 28.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7443P 56966
+26.1%
EPYC 8224P 45160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.86 28.43
Recency 12 January 2021 18 September 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 160 Watt

EPYC 7443P has a 26.1% higher aggregate performance score.

EPYC 8224P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7443P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8224P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7443P and EPYC 8224P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7443P
EPYC 7443P
AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7443P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7443P or EPYC 8224P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.