Xeon Gold 6312U vs EPYC 7402P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7402P
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
27.81
+4.4%
Xeon Gold 6312U
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
26.65

EPYC 7402P outperforms Xeon Gold 6312U by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking171186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.05no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.6213.63
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,250no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7402P 27.81
+4.4%
Xeon Gold 6312U 26.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7402P 44176
+4.4%
Xeon Gold 6312U 42329

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.81 26.65
Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 185 Watt

EPYC 7402P has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6312U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7402P
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Xeon Gold 6312U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6312U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7402P or Xeon Gold 6312U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.