EPYC 9135 vs EPYC 7401P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401P
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
17.97
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+103%

EPYC 9135 outperforms EPYC 7401P by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.7729.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.0017.30
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Turin (2024)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,075$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9135 has 513% better value for money than EPYC 7401P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401P 17.97
EPYC 9135 36.56
+103%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401P 28546
EPYC 9135 58070
+103%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.97 36.56
Recency 29 June 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 7401P has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 103.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7401P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401P and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401P or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.