Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs EPYC 7401

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
34.80
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
39.35
+13.1%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms EPYC 7401 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10768
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.4856.78
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency19.3731.03
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 499% better value for money than EPYC 7401.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data64K (per core)
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-5200
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401 34.80
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 39.35
+13.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401 55280
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62509
+13.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.80 39.35
Recency 29 June 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 7401 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D, on the other hand, has a 13.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7401 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1439 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or Ryzen 9 7950X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.