Celeron N4505 vs EPYC 7401

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
34.80
+2334%
Celeron N4505
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
1.43

EPYC 7401 outperforms Celeron N4505 by a whopping 2334% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1072202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.48no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.3713.53
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiB16 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes1288
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401 34.80
+2334%
Celeron N4505 1.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401 55280
+2340%
Celeron N4505 2266

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.80 1.43
Recency 29 June 2017 11 January 2021
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 10 Watt

EPYC 7401 has a 2333.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

Celeron N4505, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1600% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4505 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N4505 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and Celeron N4505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
Intel Celeron N4505
Celeron N4505

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Celeron N4505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or Celeron N4505, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.