A4-9120C vs EPYC 7401

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
34.80
+6344%
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54

EPYC 7401 outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 6344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1062839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.14no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency19.378.52
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplier2016
L1 cache96K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2124.5 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401 34.80
+6344%
A4-9120C 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401 55280
+6404%
A4-9120C 850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.80 0.54
Recency 29 June 2017 6 January 2019
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7401 has a 6344.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2733.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 77 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.