Ryzen 5 9600X vs EPYC 73F3

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.02
+53.1%
Ryzen 5 9600X
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
18.95

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Ryzen 5 9600X by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking153314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.6451.85
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency11.4427.59
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,521$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 9600X has 681% better value for money than EPYC 73F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 73F3 29.02
+53.1%
Ryzen 5 9600X 18.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 73F3 46103
+53.1%
Ryzen 5 9600X 30105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.02 18.95
Recency 12 January 2021 8 August 2024
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 73F3 has a 53.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 9600X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 269.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 73F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 9600X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 9600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen 5 9600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
Ryzen 5 9600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 192 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 9600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 73F3 or Ryzen 5 9600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.