Processor 300 vs EPYC 73F3

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.02
+543%
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 543% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1531319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.64no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency11.449.28
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,521$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 73F3 29.02
+543%
Processor 300 4.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 73F3 46103
+544%
Processor 300 7160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.02 4.51
Recency 12 January 2021 8 January 2024
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 4
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 46 Watt

EPYC 73F3 has a 543.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 421.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 73F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 73F3 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 73F3 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.