Xeon W-3323 vs EPYC 7371

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
19.38
+10.6%
Xeon W-3323
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 220 Watt
17.52

EPYC 7371 outperforms Xeon W-3323 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking297362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.59no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.797.54
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date16 November 2018 (6 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 19.38
+10.6%
Xeon W-3323 17.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 30782
+10.6%
Xeon W-3323 27822

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.38 17.52
Recency 16 November 2018 29 July 2021
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 220 Watt

EPYC 7371 has a 10.6% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 29.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3323, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3323 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and Xeon W-3323, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or Xeon W-3323, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.