Xeon Gold 6442Y vs EPYC 7352

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
26.20
Xeon Gold 6442Y
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 225 Watt
36.76
+40.3%

Xeon Gold 6442Y outperforms EPYC 7352 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking194103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.9649.79
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.4114.90
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350$2,065

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6442Y has 354% better value for money than EPYC 7352.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 26.20
Xeon Gold 6442Y 36.76
+40.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40096
Xeon Gold 6442Y 56263
+40.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.20 36.76
Recency 7 August 2019 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7352 has 45.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6442Y, on the other hand, has a 40.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Xeon Gold 6442Y is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7352 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Xeon Gold 6442Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
Intel Xeon Gold 6442Y
Xeon Gold 6442Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6442Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Xeon Gold 6442Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.