Ryzen 9 5900X vs EPYC 7352

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.41
+3.3%
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
24.61

EPYC 7352 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900X by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.3032.25
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency15.5122.18
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5900X has 185% better value for money than EPYC 7352.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier2337
L1 cache1.5 MB768 KB
L2 cache12 MB6 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm22x 74 mm2(CCD) + 125 mm2 (IOD)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million0 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 25.41
+3.3%
Ryzen 9 5900X 24.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40370
+3.3%
Ryzen 9 5900X 39096

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.41 24.61
Recency 7 August 2019 8 October 2020
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7352 has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 9 5900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 47.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X.

Be aware that EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3771 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Ryzen 9 5900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.