Processor 300T vs EPYC 7352

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.29no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.50no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR41700
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 8 January 2024
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7352 has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor 300T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Processor 300T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
Intel Processor 300T
Processor 300T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Processor 300T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Processor 300T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.