EPYC 7313 vs EPYC 7352

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.41
+3.3%
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
24.61

EPYC 7352 outperforms EPYC 7313 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking193202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.8416.45
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.5115.03
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313 has 52% better value for money than EPYC 7352.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier2330
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 25.41
+3.3%
EPYC 7313 24.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40370
+3.3%
EPYC 7313 39091

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.41 24.61
Recency 7 August 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32

EPYC 7352 has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.