Phenom X3 8250e vs EPYC 7351P

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
16.15
+2275%
Phenom X3 8250e
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 65 Watt
0.68

EPYC 7351P outperforms Phenom X3 8250e by a whopping 2275% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4092721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.46no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.990.99
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Toliman (2008)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads323
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.9 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size192 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351P 16.15
+2275%
Phenom X3 8250e 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+2267%
Phenom X3 8250e 1084

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.15 0.68
Physical cores 16 3
Threads 32 3
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 2275% higher aggregate performance score, 433.3% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom X3 8250e, on the other hand, has 161.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom X3 8250e in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while Phenom X3 8250e is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and Phenom X3 8250e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
AMD Phenom X3 8250e
Phenom X3 8250e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 10 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8250e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or Phenom X3 8250e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.