EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 7343

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking176not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.30no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.66no data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,565$4,256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size4x 81 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 March 2021 10 October 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 320 Watt

EPYC 7343 has 68.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7343 or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.