Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs EPYC 7313P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
26.19
+1.4%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.82

EPYC 7313P outperforms Apple M3 Max 16-Core by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking184189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.33no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M3
Power efficiency15.9931.33
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)no data
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$913no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.06 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+3 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors16,600 million92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313P 26.19
+1.4%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7313P 41609
+1.5%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.19 25.82
Recency 15 March 2021 30 October 2023
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 78 Watt

EPYC 7313P has a 1.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 98.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.

Be aware that EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 267 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313P or Apple M3 Max 16-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.