Xeon Gold 6416H vs EPYC 7313

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.54
Xeon Gold 6416H
2023
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
26.53
+3.9%

Xeon Gold 6416H outperforms EPYC 7313 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking198187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.0549.50
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.0314.66
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083$1,444

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6416H has 190% better value for money than EPYC 7313.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads3236
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
SocketSP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H.

PCIe version4.05
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313 25.54
Xeon Gold 6416H 26.53
+3.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7313 39091
Xeon Gold 6416H 40606
+3.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.54 26.53
Recency 12 January 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 16 18
Threads 32 36
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 165 Watt

EPYC 7313 has 6.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6416H, on the other hand, has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 12.5% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7313 and Xeon Gold 6416H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
Intel Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon Gold 6416H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6416H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7313 or Xeon Gold 6416H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.