Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.80
Xeon E5-2698B V3
2015
16 cores / 32 threads, 135 Watt
10.64
+8.6%

Xeon E5-2698B V3 outperforms EPYC 7301 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking802751
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.03no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency5.267.19
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)40 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size192 mm2356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data88 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR42011-3
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2133
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.80
Xeon E5-2698B V3 10.64
+8.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
Xeon E5-2698B V3 16287
+8.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.80 10.64
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 135 Watt

EPYC 7301 has a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2698B V3, on the other hand, has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 25.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Xeon E5-2698B V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
Intel Xeon E5-2698B V3
Xeon E5-2698B V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698B V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Xeon E5-2698B V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.