Atom x7809C vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking802not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.03no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency5.26no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$117

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1289

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 8 April 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 25 Watt

EPYC 7301 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom x7809C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 580% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7809C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Atom x7809C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
Intel Atom x7809C
Atom x7809C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7809C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Atom x7809C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.