Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs EPYC 72F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.16
+21.6%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.11

EPYC 72F3 outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking374522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.59no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency9.0247.69
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,468no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 72F3 17.16
+21.6%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 72F3 27252
+21.6%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.16 14.11
Recency 12 January 2021 1 October 2024
Threads 16 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 72F3 has a 21.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 0% more threads, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 72F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 72F3 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.