Ultra 7 265F vs EPYC 72F3

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	370	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.28	no data
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	AMD EPYC	no data
Power efficiency	9.02	no data
Architecture codename	Milan (2021−2023)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)	January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,468	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads	16	20
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	5.3 GHz
Multiplier	37	no data
L1 cache	512 KB	112 KB (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB	3 MB (per core)
L3 cache	256 MB (shared)	30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	7 nm+	3 nm
Die size	8x 81 mm2	243 mm2
Number of transistors	33,200 million	17,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	SP3	1851
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
TSX	-	+

Security technologies

EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR5
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.795 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version	4.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	128	20

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	8	20
Threads	16	20
Chip lithography	7 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 72F3 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---